Like s390 and the jailhouse hypervisor, LoongArch's PCI architecture allows
passing isolated PCI functions to a guest OS instance. So it is possible
that there is a multi-function device without function 0 for the host or
guest.
Allow probing such functions by adding a IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOONGARCH) case
in the hypervisor_isolated_pci_functions() helper.
This is similar to commit 189c6c33ff42 ("PCI: Extend isolated function
probing to s390").
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250624062927.4037734-1-chenhuacai@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: maoxiaochuan <maoxiaochuan@loongson.cn>
the error message is as follow:
../arch/loongarch/mm/mmap.c: In function ‘arch_get_unmapped_area_common’:
../arch/loongarch/mm/mmap.c:69:35: error: implicit declaration of function ‘huge_page_mask_align’; did you mean ‘huge_page_mask’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
69 | info.align_mask = huge_page_mask_align(filp);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| huge_page_mask
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
code sync for linux-6.13
Signed-off-by: maoxiaochuan <maoxiaochuan@loongson.cn>
The enable_gpe_wakeup() function calls acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes(),
and the later one may call the preempt_schedule_common() function,
resulting in a thread switch and causing the CPU to be in an interrupt
enabled state after the enable_gpe_wakeup() function returns, leading
to the warnings as follow.
[ C0] WARNING: ... at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:845 ktime_get+0xbc/0xc8
[ C0] ...
[ C0] Call Trace:
[ C0] [<90000000002243b4>] show_stack+0x64/0x188
[ C0] [<900000000164673c>] dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x88
[ C0] [<90000000002687e4>] __warn+0x8c/0x148
[ C0] [<90000000015e9978>] report_bug+0x1c0/0x2b0
[ C0] [<90000000016478e4>] do_bp+0x204/0x3b8
[ C0] [<90000000025b1924>] exception_handlers+0x1924/0x10000
[ C0] [<9000000000343bbc>] ktime_get+0xbc/0xc8
[ C0] [<9000000000354c08>] tick_sched_timer+0x30/0xb0
[ C0] [<90000000003408e0>] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x160/0x378
[ C0] [<9000000000341f14>] hrtimer_interrupt+0x144/0x388
[ C0] [<9000000000228348>] constant_timer_interrupt+0x38/0x48
[ C0] [<90000000002feba4>] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x64/0x1e8
[ C0] [<90000000002fed48>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x80
[ C0] [<9000000000306b9c>] handle_percpu_irq+0x5c/0x98
[ C0] [<90000000002fd4a0>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x30/0x48
[ C0] [<9000000000d0c7b0>] handle_cpu_irq+0x70/0xa8
[ C0] [<9000000001646b30>] handle_loongarch_irq+0x30/0x48
[ C0] [<9000000001646bc8>] do_vint+0x80/0xe0
[ C0] [<90000000002aea1c>] finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x8c/0x2a8
[ C0] [<900000000164e34c>] __schedule+0x314/0xa48
[ C0] [<900000000164ead8>] schedule+0x58/0xf0
[ C0] [<9000000000294a2c>] worker_thread+0x224/0x498
[ C0] [<900000000029d2f0>] kthread+0xf8/0x108
[ C0] [<9000000000221f28>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0xc/0xa4
[ C0]
[ C0] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
The root cause is acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() uses a mutex to protect
acpi_hw_enable_all_wakeup_gpes(), and acpi_ut_acquire_mutex() may cause
a thread switch. Since there is no longer concurrent execution during
loongarch_acpi_suspend(), we can call acpi_hw_enable_all_wakeup_gpes()
directly in enable_gpe_wakeup().
The solution is similar to commit 22db06337f590d01 ("ACPI: sleep: Avoid
breaking S3 wakeup due to might_sleep()").
Fixes: 366bb35a8e48 ("LoongArch: Add suspend (ACPI S3) support")
Signed-off-by: Qunqin Zhao <zhaoqunqin@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: maoxiaochuan <maoxiaochuan@loongson.cn>
Huacai Chen